Geistlich Blog header image
Soft tissues around implants

It’s not only a matter of aesthetics

Sufficient soft tissue volume and keratinized tissue around implants are key for implant success. A clinical update on gold standards and alternatives.

The physiologic changes after tooth extraction lead to soft and hard tissue deficiencies. These influence the appearance of the prosthetic restoration and the peri-implant tissues.1
In the past, these deficiencies were treated through bone regenerative techniques. But, more recently, bone regeneration has been combined with soft tissue grafting, to achieve a better volume gain and to restore the contours of the alveolar ridge.2

Soft tissue thickness matters

Soft tissue thickness influences the translucency and color of the peri-implant tissues. But recent data have also shown that Areas with thick soft tissues may be less prone to the initial bone loss associated with the establishment of the biologic width.3 Thus, soft tissue grafting has become a common procedure when treating aesthetically demanding situations.

Soft tissue harvesting

Connective tissue grafts increase soft tissue contours and improve the harmony between restorations and adjacent tissues.4 The most frequent donor sites are the anterior and posterior parts of the palate, including the maxillary tuberosity. But, the harvest site may influence the thickness of the graft. Thus, the selection of the harvest site must be based on the amount of tissue needed.5(Fig. 1) Clinicians tend to harvest grafts with greater proportions of lamina propria, since it is believed to be more stable compared to glandular or fatty tissue. Graft thickness has been directly correlated with the amount of pain perceived by patients.6

A new alternative to autologous grafts

Autologous grafts are associated with a greater number of post-surgical complications. These include bleeding and pain. There is great interest in the scientific community to develop soft tissue substitutes that achieve similar outcomes, but reduce morbidity.
Currently, researchers are testing a new 3-D collagen matrix, that has been designed to increase the quantity of soft tissue around implants. A recent publication has shown promising results for this matrix when compared to autologous connective tissue.7(Fig. 2)

Flap techniques

Conventional flaps or tunnel preparations are the most common flap techniques in the available literature. Conventional flaps allow for better access and graft fixation. Tunnel preparations have the advantage of better preserving papillae height. Regardless of the surgical technique, it is important that the soft tissue graft or substitute be fixed in the area most likely to create a benefit: the transition zone from the implant shoulder to the gingival margin.

Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants

Besides the thickness of the peri-implant tissues, the width of keratinized tissue has received significant attention. A reduced width of keratinized mucosa may be more prone to lingual plaque accumulation, bleeding on probing and buccal soft tissue recession.8 Considering the available data, clinicians should consider procedures aimed at preserving keratinized tissue. When there is significant displacement of the mucogingival junction after GBR treatments, keratinized tissue augmentation procedures should be considered to enable patients to maintain oral hygiene in non-aesthetic areas.

Your Comment

Yes, I have read the privacy policy and agree to it.